Maven - Maven vs Ant - maven tutorial
maven tutorial tags : apache maven , maven repository , maven central
Difference between Ant and Maven?
- Maven is better for managing dependencies (but Ant is ok with them too, if you use Ant+Ivy) and build artifacts.
- The main benefit from maven - its lifecycle. ... Ant is better for controlling of build process. Before your very first build you have to write you build.xml.
- Maven vs. Ant is one of the semi-religious topics (like IntelliJ vs. Eclipse, SWT vs. Swing or Spring vs. EJB).
- Dependent on you specifics needs, both build tools may be interesting for you.
- Ant is just a framework, or a build-DSL which cannot be used out of the box.
- You have to create your build-script from existing Ant-tasks.
- The Ant tasks do not presrcibe any conventions or configuration - the definition of project layout is your responsibility.
Learn Maven Tutorial - Ant vs Maven - Maven Example
Ant Vs Maven
- Ant and Maven both are build tools provided by Apache.
- The main purpose of these technologies is to ease the build process of a project.
- There are many differences between ant and maven that are given below:
| Ant | Maven |
|---|---|
| Ant doesn't has formal conventions, so we need to provide information of the project structure in build.xml file. |
Maven has a convention to place source code, compiled code etc. So we don't need to provide information about the project structure in pom.xml file. |
| Ant is procedural, you need to provide information about what to do and when to do through code. You need to provide order. |
Maven is declarative, everything you define in the pom.xml file. |
| There is no life cycle in Ant. | There is life cycle in Maven. |
| It is a tool box. | It is a framework. |
| It is mainly a build tool. | It is mainly a project management tool. |
| The ant scripts are not reusable. | The maven plugins are reusable. |
| It is less preferred than Maven. | It is more preferred than Ant. |